Files
o3de/Assets/Engine/Fonts/Vera_COPYRIGHT.TXT
T
lumberyard-employee-dm 3dec5d3b71 LYN-2537 engine assets (#254)
* LYN-2537 Moved the Engine and Editor folder to be within the EngineAssets folder

* Fixed Documentation in bootstrap.cfg to correct the path to the user project specific registry file

* Adding a newline to the output of AssetCatalog 'Registering asset..., but type is not set' message

* Updating the AssetProcessorPlatformConfig.setreg Scan Folder to detect
the @ENGINEROOT@/EngineAssets/Engine path for engine runtime assets and
@ENGINEROOT@/EngineAssets/Editor path for engine tool assets

* Updating references to Icons and other assets to account for moving the
Engine and Editor folder under a single EngineAssets folder

* Moving the Engine Settings Registry folder from Engine/Registry -> Registry

* Removed the LY_PROJECT_CMAKE_PATH define as it is not portable to other locations. It is hard coded to the project location that was used for the CMake configuration. Furthermore it paths with backslashes within it are treated as escape characters and not a path separator

* Updated the LyTestTools asset_processor.py script to copy the exclude.filetag from the EngineAssets/Engine directory now

* Fixed Atom Shader Preprocessing when running using an External Project

* Updated the TSGenerateAction.cpp to fix the build error with using a renamed variable

* Updated the Install_Common.cmake ly_setup_others function to install the
EngineAssets directory and the each of the Gem's Assets directory while
maintaining the relative directory structure to the Engine Root
Also updated the install step to install the Registry folder at the
engine root

* Fixed the copying of the Registry folder to be in the install root, instead of under a second 'Registry' folder

* Moving the AssetProcessorPlatformConfig.setreg file over to the Registry folder

* Updated the LyTestTools and C++ code to point that the new location of
the AssetProcessorPlatformConfig.setreg file inside of the Registry
folder

* Renamed Test AssetProcessor*Config.ini files to have the .setreg extension

* Converted the AssetProcessor test setreg files from ini format to json
format using the SerializeContextTools convert-ini command

* Updated the AssetProcessor CMakeLists.txt to copy over the test setreg files to the build folder

* Updated the assetprocessor test file list to point at the renamed AsssetProcessor*Config setreg filenames

* Removed the Output Prefix code from the AssetProcessor. The complexity that it brought to the AP code is not needed, as users can replicate the behavior by just moving there assets underneath a another folder, underneath the scan folder

* Adding back support to read the AssetProcessorPlatformConfig.setreg file from the asset root. This is only needed for C++ UnitTests as they run in an environment where the accessing the Engine Settings Registry is not available

* Updating the Install_common.cmake logic to copy any "Assets" folder to
the install layout.
The Script has also been updated to copy over the "Assets" folder in the
Engine Root to the install layout instead of an "EngineAssets" folder

* Updating References to EngineAssets source asset folder in code to be the Assets source folder

* Moved the Engine Source Asset folder of 'EngineAssets' to a new folder name of 'Assets'. This is inline with the naming scheme we use for Gem asset folders

* Adding the EngineFinder.cmake to the AutomatedTesting project to allow it to work in a project centric manner

* Updating the LyTestTools copy_assets_to_project function to be able to copy assets with folders to the temporary project root
Fixed an issue in LyTestTools where the temporary log directory could have shutil.rmtree being called twice on it leading to an exception which fails an automated test

Updated the asset_procesor_gui_tests_2 AddScanFolder test to not use the
output prefix, but instead place the source asset root into a
subdirectory

* Correct the AssetProcessorPlatformConfig Scan Folders for the EngineAssets directory to point at the Assets directory

* Updated the asset procesor batch dependency test scan folder to point at the 'Assets' folder instead of 'EngineAssets'
2021-04-28 21:38:43 -05:00

125 lines
5.8 KiB
Plaintext

Bitstream Vera Fonts Copyright
The fonts have a generous copyright, allowing derivative works (as
long as "Bitstream" or "Vera" are not in the names), and full
redistribution (so long as they are not *sold* by themselves). They
can be be bundled, redistributed and sold with any software.
The fonts are distributed under the following copyright:
Copyright
=========
Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Bitstream
Vera is a trademark of Bitstream, Inc.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
a copy of the fonts accompanying this license ("Fonts") and associated
documentation files (the "Font Software"), to reproduce and distribute
the Font Software, including without limitation the rights to use,
copy, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sell copies of the Font
Software, and to permit persons to whom the Font Software is furnished
to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright and trademark notices and this permission notice
shall be included in all copies of one or more of the Font Software
typefaces.
The Font Software may be modified, altered, or added to, and in
particular the designs of glyphs or characters in the Fonts may be
modified and additional glyphs or characters may be added to the
Fonts, only if the fonts are renamed to names not containing either
the words "Bitstream" or the word "Vera".
This License becomes null and void to the extent applicable to Fonts
or Font Software that has been modified and is distributed under the
"Bitstream Vera" names.
The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package but
no copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by
itself.
THE FONT SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT
OF COPYRIGHT, PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR OTHER RIGHT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
BITSTREAM OR THE GNOME FOUNDATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
OTHER LIABILITY, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE FONT
SOFTWARE OR FROM OTHER DEALINGS IN THE FONT SOFTWARE.
Except as contained in this notice, the names of Gnome, the Gnome
Foundation, and Bitstream Inc., shall not be used in advertising or
otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Font
Software without prior written authorization from the Gnome Foundation
or Bitstream Inc., respectively. For further information, contact:
fonts at gnome dot org.
Copyright FAQ
=============
1. I don't understand the resale restriction... What gives?
Bitstream is giving away these fonts, but wishes to ensure its
competitors can't just drop the fonts as is into a font sale system
and sell them as is. It seems fair that if Bitstream can't make money
from the Bitstream Vera fonts, their competitors should not be able to
do so either. You can sell the fonts as part of any software package,
however.
2. I want to package these fonts separately for distribution and
sale as part of a larger software package or system. Can I do so?
Yes. A RPM or Debian package is a "larger software package" to begin
with, and you aren't selling them independently by themselves.
See 1. above.
3. Are derivative works allowed?
Yes!
4. Can I change or add to the font(s)?
Yes, but you must change the name(s) of the font(s).
5. Under what terms are derivative works allowed?
You must change the name(s) of the fonts. This is to ensure the
quality of the fonts, both to protect Bitstream and Gnome. We want to
ensure that if an application has opened a font specifically of these
names, it gets what it expects (though of course, using fontconfig,
substitutions could still could have occurred during font
opening). You must include the Bitstream copyright. Additional
copyrights can be added, as per copyright law. Happy Font Hacking!
6. If I have improvements for Bitstream Vera, is it possible they might get
adopted in future versions?
Yes. The contract between the Gnome Foundation and Bitstream has
provisions for working with Bitstream to ensure quality additions to
the Bitstream Vera font family. Please contact us if you have such
additions. Note, that in general, we will want such additions for the
entire family, not just a single font, and that you'll have to keep
both Gnome and Jim Lyles, Vera's designer, happy! To make sense to add
glyphs to the font, they must be stylistically in keeping with Vera's
design. Vera cannot become a "ransom note" font. Jim Lyles will be
providing a document describing the design elements used in Vera, as a
guide and aid for people interested in contributing to Vera.
7. I want to sell a software package that uses these fonts: Can I do so?
Sure. Bundle the fonts with your software and sell your software
with the fonts. That is the intent of the copyright.
8. If applications have built the names "Bitstream Vera" into them,
can I override this somehow to use fonts of my choosing?
This depends on exact details of the software. Most open source
systems and software (e.g., Gnome, KDE, etc.) are now converting to
use fontconfig (see www.fontconfig.org) to handle font configuration,
selection and substitution; it has provisions for overriding font
names and subsituting alternatives. An example is provided by the
supplied local.conf file, which chooses the family Bitstream Vera for
"sans", "serif" and "monospace". Other software (e.g., the XFree86
core server) has other mechanisms for font substitution.