* Revert to regular run when invalid commits used.
* Cirrect s3 logging of last commit hash storage
* Add s3 top level url and build number script params.
* Use existing REPOSITORY_NAME env var.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Fix typo in MARS document key.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Add diff support for commits on different branches.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Restore archiving of historic data objects.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Correctly handle commit diffs for PR builds.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Comment out archiving of historic data objects.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Fix python typo
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Remove comment pertaining to s3 bucket.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Fix test selection efficiency for MARS.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Fix for PathLib unlink wrong version parameter.
* Fix dst target for TIAF.
* Remove TIAF historic data arhciving on s3 buckets
* Change permissions for TIAF bucket upload
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Fix historic working dir creation
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Add new line at EOF
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
* Removing extra whitespace at end of file
Signed-off-by: lumberyard-employee-dm <56135373+lumberyard-employee-dm@users.noreply.github.com>
* Log global exception caught by TIAF driver
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: lumberyard-employee-dm <56135373+lumberyard-employee-dm@users.noreply.github.com>
We currently cannot predict when a given snapshot will be taken. This is
problematic as test impact analysis assumes that the coverage data will
be updated after each run. As we have no control over when our coverage
data will persist we will instead always seed when the pipeline and
branch is one of the seeding pipelines, otherwise we will attempt to
read that seed data and perform test impact analysis (if no seed data is
present we will fall back to a regular, uninstrumented run of all test
targets).
This approach has the following implications:
1. PR builds will benefit from test impact analysis as the seed data is
(hopefully) available at the time the snapshot is created.
2. Builds for the aforementioned seeding branches and pipelines will not
benefit from test impact analysis and will incur the cost of seeding
regardless of whether or not that generated seed data ends up in the
snapshot.
Signed-off-by: John <jonawals@amazon.com>
jonawals
Steve Pham
Chris Galvan
Gene Walters